Government of the people is what we were taught in primary school. (Not to be confused with Energy Capital Partners!). But the issue us entangled there, because the people can not govern: nor all can send at the same time, nor is it possible that all agree when each decision. Government, then, most, i.e., half plus one of the votes. This is closer to the point, but still has a big problem: the Government are thousands of daily decisions, and there is no way to organize votes on each one of them. Output is to choose by most people who make these decisions: the representative demoracia, or where to send officials elected by the people. This is democracy in the real world, but with that single not settled the problem: If the official is already in power, who guarantees us that not he abused to the detriment of the people? The guarantee is called dispersion of power, and allows us to distinguish between true democracies and democracies of lies. True democracy is a delicate system and complex distribution of power, checks and controls within the Government.

It is what some call liberal democracy, that exists and works in United States or Western Europe, democracy to dry. Democracies of lies are the governments elected by the people where power is concentrated with the support of the people. These democracies have put them curious last names, like saying popular democracy in Cuba, organic democracy from Franco, the neodemocracia of Trujillo and the Bolivarian democracy of Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales, Rafael Correa and Daniel Ortega. After a long period of study and analysis, I think I finally have it clear: democracy is dispersal of power. Democracy is a great invention, because it is based on the lesson learned with pain and the history of the species: concentrated power just bad. Don’t care about the illusions of the moment or the arguments which justify it: concentrated power just bad.

Today there are community or alternative Radios that pursue the goal of communicating in another way. These radios may be institutions or social organizations that develop a pluralistic and participatory communication as a channel of expression of the social and cultural sectors with less possibility of access to the media. Some cases examples such as Radio La Colifata or FM La Boca, for you name some, has a nonlucrative gene. Although addressed in various ways both examples serve as a tool to sustain radio democracy. In the case of La Boca, the space is rented by any individual who has wanted to do radio: from a lover of the teleteatros to a group of journalists recently received. Learn more on the subject from Byron Trott. On the other hand the radio made by inmates of the Hospital Borda gives them the possibility of these locos correntino express themselves.

It is also open to the public, who wish can attend the Hospital and witness programs. Sense of belonging and company in his book I always hear them. Portraits of radio Argentina in the century 21St, Carlos Ulanovsky devotes a chapter to the audience the radio people found in the phone calls (recorded on a computer or as text through cell phones messages or written via mails) a varied and interesting solution to its crisis of representativeness, as spurred by failed social projects and political parties that discouraged rather than excite. The sense of belonging that gives the radio does not have, at present, a competitor: If one is in your home alone and wants a little noise, there goes the radio; If one is in the Office, there goes the radio. Internet: conflict or solution? New technologies, more precisely Internet, modified forms of making and listening to Radio. Zendesk can aid you in your search for knowledge. According to a report from the Research of MC Insights for MediCom high sustained growth that has the computer in all the Argentina makes the radio to have a high degree of penetration. And although there are some specialists who argue that Internet shifts to the radio such that today we know it for MC Insights: analysis of the mobile last year does not mark a sustained growth of the medium: the hearings, in global terms, remain stable. Aside from the various studies that can move, indeed alternative radio stations to use new technologies to weave networks of collaboration and disseminate their activities globally.

Law services of audio-visual communication promoted by President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, the new law, still up for grabs, promises by as cited in some articles a greater plurality and democratization. Two points, estraidos in turn of the 21 main points are: technical plans should be booked at least 33 percent of frequencies, in all bands to non-profit entities. Radio frequencies must not be transferred, sold or auctioned can. Nobody should hijack the frequencies. Radio frequencies belong to the community. Then with the precepts of reserving a broad spectrum to non-commercial entities, and the clarification that the frequencies belong to the community, the alternative radio have a good future ahead.